Archive for April, 2008

Global warming: we have 10 years to avoid catastrophe

Thursday, April 10th, 2008

Global warming

The arxiv isn’t usually the place where climate scientists make predictions about global warming but yesterday, they made an exception. A group led by James Hansen, one of the world’s leading climate scientists who works at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Sciences, warned that global warming is having much worse effects on Earth’s climate than thought. They say without immediate action, humanity is in danger of “seeding irreversible catastrophic effects.”

The background, in case you’ve been stuck on a desert island for the last few years, is that CO2 levels in the atmosphere have doubled from 180 ppm in pre-glacial times to 385 ppm today, most which has come since the industrial age began. “Humanity today, collectively, must face the uncomfortable fact that industrial civilization itself has become the principal driver of global climate,” says Hansen and co.

So what to do? The International Panel on Climate Change suggests that global warming of more than 2-3 degrees C may be dangerous, the EU says we should attempt to limit global warming to no more than 2 degrees C while Hansen himself has said that 1 degree C should be the maximum we should tolerate. This last estimate implies a maximum level of CO2 of 450ppm.

Now Hansen says he was wrong and that we need to aim for a CO2 level of only 350 ppm to be sure of maintaining the climate in the state we’re used to. Because if we carry on as we are, the world is going to change in ways that hard to imagine. I’ll let Hansen do the rest of the talking:

“Present policies, with continued construction of coal-fired power plants without CO2 capture, suggest that decision-makers do not appreciate the gravity of the situation. We must begin to move now toward the era beyond fossil fuels. Continued growth of greenhouse gas emissions, for just another decade, practically eliminates the possibility of near-term return of atmospheric composition beneath the tipping level for catastrophic effects.”

Frightening stuff.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.1126: Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.1135: Supporting Material

A survey of quantum programming languages

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

It cannot be long before somebody breathes life into a useful quantum computer. And when that happens, an entirely new breed of keyboard monkey will be born: the quantum computer programmer.

This strange animal will have to work with the weird and wonderful tools of the quantum world, such as superposition of quantum bits, entanglement, destructive measurement and the no-cloning theorem.

Clearly no conventional programming language has operators and data structures that can handle these concepts but a growing number of physcists have been developing languages that can. Today, Donald Sofge at the Naval Research Laboratory in DC has kindly surveyed them and their history.

He divides them into three categories:

i) Imperative Programming Languages which use statements to change the global state of a program.  Classical examples include FORTRAN, C and Java. Quantum examples include QCL (quantum computation language) which was probably the first proper quantum programming language (it was developed by Bernhard Omer at the Technical University ofVienna about 10 years ago).

Another example is Q Language developed by Stefano Betelli and colleagues at Trento University in Italy.

ii) Functional Quantum Programming Languages by contrast,map inputs to outputs to perform mathematical transformations. This idea has influenced the development of conventional languages such as Lisp, ML and Haskell.

Quantum versions include QFC (quantum flow charts) proposed by Peter Selinger at Dalhousie University in Canada and QML developed by Thorsten Altenkirch at the University of Nottignham in the UK.

iii) Others

A number of people have developed languages aimed specifically at supporting cryptographic protocols. A good example is cQPL based on Selinger’s QP. Another language, CQP (communicating quantum
processes), relies on quantum process algebras to model systems that combine both quantum and classical elements.

Sofge’s paper makes a fascinating, if technical read. But if you’re a young programmer wondering what you’ll be working on in 30 years time, get your Landau and Lifshitz out of the attic and start working through it.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.1118: A Survey of Quantum Programming Languages

Criticality and the brain

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Brain connections

Our understanding of how various parts of brain function is advancing at breakneck speed and yet we are as far away as ever from an overarching “theory of the brain” that attempts to encompass these discoveries. Such a theory would unite disparate discoveries in brain science under a unifying theme.

Now Dante Chialvo from Northwestern University in Chicago and colleagues attempt to do just that. Their proposal is that the brain is spontaneously posed at the border of a second order phase transition, just like the transition a ferromagnetic material undergoes as it swtches from a non-magnetic to a magnetic phase.

One of the features of these transitions is the existence of a critical point in which both phases exist simultaneously in a way that ensures that the distinction between them more or less disappears. At this so called “criticality”, all kinds of curious phenonena have been found, including self organising behaviour.

Chialvo and buddies say “all human behaviors, including thoughts, undirected or goal oriented actions or any state of mind, are the outcome of a dynamical system at or near a critical state.”

They make a list of features that they would expect the brain to demonstrate in experiment were it operating close to criticality.

At large scales, they say, we should see cortical long range correlations in space and time as well as large scale anti-correlated cortical states. That certainly seems to be true of our brains in general.

And at small scale, we should see “Neuronal avalanches”, as the normal homeostatic state for most neocortical circuits. And sure enough, the group point to evidence for this.

The trouble is that these look very much like an after-the-fact- predictions in this paper, a feeling that is backed up by the absence of any testable hypothesis about the brain.

If the brain is close to crticiallity (which doesn’t seem like too far fetched an idea), surely it would be possible to make some predictions about the results of experiments such as those involving human attention, optical illusions and the reaction to various stimuli.

So while Chialvo’s proposal may make the pretense of being a theory of the brain, to my mind they’ll have to settle for the status of “interesting idea” until somebody takes them significantly further.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.0032: The Brain: What is Critical about It?

The hunt for superheavy elements

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Superheavy elements

The heaviest elements are a shy, retiring bunch. No sooner are they created than they disappear in a puff of smoke. The heaviest, ununoctium, has an atomic number of 118 and an atomic weight of 294. The Russians made a single atom of the stuff back in 2002 only to discover that it hung around for all of a millisecond.

But it has long been thought that islands of stability exist higher up in the periodic table, where much heavier elements might exist for much longer. Today Chhanda Samanta from the University of Richmond in Virginia, gives the low down on what to expect.

One important factor turns out to be the number of neutrons an element posseses, with islands of stability thought to exist at N=162 and 184.

Around N=162, Samanta says keep an eye out for seaborgium-268 with a half life of 3.2 hours. And at N=184 he points to  darmstadtium-294, which looks as if it’ll hang around for at least 311 years and seaborgium-290 which has a half life of a whopping 10^8 years.

The race is on to find these elements and the main players are the Russians at Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Dubna and the Americans at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. (Although in the true spirit of post cold war co-operation they’ve together formed a collaboration called the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research.)

What’s the betting we’ll see one of these superheavies within the year?

Ref:  arxiv.org/abs/0803.4151: Superheavy Elements in the Magic Islands

In case ya missed ’em…

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

…the sparks from the arxivblog this week:

 A new class of photon gun

Buckyballs boost flash memory

The coming blackout

Statistical evidence of drug abuse in baseball

Relativity sung to the tune of Yellow Submarine

Qutrit breakthrough brings quantum computers closer

Qutits ‘n’ qutats

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

The best of the rest from the physics arxiv this week:

Improving Resolution by Means of Ghost Imaging

Realistic Haptic Rendering of Interacting Deformable Objects in Virtual Environments

Radio Detection of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays

The Yale Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber

The Galactic Gamma-Ray Club

Qutrit breakthrough brings quantum computers closer

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Toffoli gate

The folks playing with quantum computers have been claiming for years that their gadgets will one day make today’s supercomputers look like quivering lumps of jelly. But so far, their computers have yet to match the calculating prowess of a 10-year old with ADHD.

The most exciting work so far has been on universal quantum logic gates, the building blocks of any computer. A number of groups have built and demonstrated these and one team even took their gates for the computing equivalent of a run round the block by factorising the number 15.

The trouble is that, to do anything useful with universal quantum gates, you need at least dozens and preferably hundreds of them, all joined together. And because of various errors and problems that creep in, that’s more or less impossible with today’s technology.

Which is why a breakthrough by an Australian group led by Andrew White at the University of Queensland is so exciting. They have built and tested quantum logic gates that are vastly more powerful than those that have gone before by exploiting the higher dimensions available in in quantum mechanics. For example, a qubit can be encoded in a photon’s polarisation. But a photon has other dimensions which can also be used to carry information, such as its arrival time, photon number or frequency. By exploiting these, a photon can easily be used as a much more powerful three level system called a qutrit.

This is how the Ozzie team have exploited the idea: during a computation, their gates convert qubits into qutrits, process the quantum information in this more powerful form and then convert it back into qubits. All using plain old vanilla optics.

That allows a dramatic reduction in the number of gates necessary to perform a specific task. Using only three of the higher dimension logic gates, the team has built and tested a Toffoli logic gate that could only have been constructed using 6 conventional logic gates. And they say that a computer made up of 50 conventional quantum logic gates could be built using only 9 of theirs.

That’s a significant reduction. What’s more, they reckon that these kinds of numbers are possible with today’s linear optics technology.

That means these guys are right now bent over an optical bench with screwdrivers and lens cloths at the ready, attempting to build the world’s most powerful quantum computer. We may see the results–a decent factorisation perhaps–within months.

Could it be that Australia is about to become the center of the quantum computing world?

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.0272: Quantum Computing using Shortcuts through Higher Dimensions

Relativity sung to the tune of Yellow Submarine

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Max Tegmark and Flora Lopis have been working hard on teaching the 8.033 course on relativity at MIT. They publish it today on the arXiv saying:

“To maximize the learning experience from this technical review, the reader is encouraged to sing it to the tune of Yellow Submarine, with italicized lines going like the chorus…”

Romer measured the speed of light,
and something basic just wasn’t right.
because Michaelson and Morley
showed that aether fit data poorly.

We jump to 1905.
In Einstein’s brain, ideas thrive:
“The laws of nature must be the same
in every inertial frame”
We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity.
Yes we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity.

Einstein’s postulates imply
that planes are shorter when they fly.
Their clocks are slowed by time dilation,
and look warped from aberration.
Cos theta-prime is cos theta minus beta … over one minus beta cos theta.
Yes we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity.

With the Lorentz transformation,
we calculate the relation
between Chris’s and Zoe’s frame,
but all invariants, they are the same.
Like B dot E and B-squared minus E-squared,
… and the rest mass squared which is E-squared minus p-squared.
’cos we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity

Soon physicists had a proclivity
for using relativity.
But nukes made us all scared
because E = mc2.
Everything is relative, even simultaneity,
and soon Einstein’s become a de facto physics deity.
’cos we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.0016: Relativity Revisited

Statistical evidence of drug abuse in baseball

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Baseball stats

How many major league baseball players have used performance-enhancing drugs? The answer turns out to be buried in the performance statistics of players, if you know where to look.

Eugene Stanley and colleagues at Boston University have done the appropriate number crunching and say that a whopping 5 per cent of players must have been users, and that’s just a lower limit. The evidence comes from an analysis of home runs hit by players in the last 25 years.

Stanley’s analysis throws up some interesting takes on baseball. For example, it’s easy to imagine that pitchers and batters would both benefit from the increased strength and rapid recovery from injury that performance enhancing drugs allow. Not so, says Stanley:

We see evidence of competitive advantage mainly in the case of home runs. This indicates that the level of competition between pitcher and batter are tipping in the favor of the batter, possibly as a result of widespread performance-enhancing drug use.”


The statistics seem to back up the findings of former senator George Mitchell who published the results of a two year investigation into the widespread use of drugs among professional major league baseball players in December last year. The report listed 89 players who are alleged to have used steroids or other drugs.

Stanley ends by pointing out that drug use is by no means confined to baseball: “Performance-enhancing drugs are the core of a pandemic that not only poses personal health risk, but also places the integrity of sports in jeopardy.”

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0804.0061: Statistical Evidence Consistent with Performance-enhancing Drugs in Professional Baseball

The coming blackout

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

On Monday, 17th December 2007, Europe narrowly avoided disaster. A cold snap had lowered the temperature across much of continent to several degrees below average and that evening, as households across the continent switched on their heating systems, the power consumption hit critical levels.

France, Italy and Spain all set new records for power consumption. By sheer luck, Switzerland and Germany, which were less cold, were able to provide some 1.6 GWe of spare capacity to cover the cracks in the system.

As it turned out, the rest of the winter was abnormally mild. But had the cold snap been more widespread, the European electricity supply could have collapsed.

The problem dates from about 30 years ago when Europe’s grid system and generating capacity was built with a huge amount of spare capacity. Since then, as economies have boomed, politicians have had little incentive to upgrade the system. In the meantime, consumption has been increasing at the rate of 1-2 per cent per year and today the spare capacity has all but gone. With the simplest extrapolation being that demand will continue to grow at the same rate, a crisis looms.

Now the Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity, an association of power providers in Europe has issued a report detailing the system’s shortcomings. And analysis on the arXiv by Michael Dittmar at the Swiss Federal Institue of Technology in Zurich paints an even gloomier picture, not least because there is no clear short term path to reducing consumption or increasing generating capacity.

Europe has suffered a number of large blackouts in recent years, notably in Italy between 28-29th September 2003 and in France and Germany on 4 November 2006. But worse looks to be on the cards. Dittmar’s message is that the next winter of 2008/9 will test the European grid to its limits.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0803.4421: The European Electricity Grid System and Winter Peak Load Stress