Massive miscalculation makes LHC safety assurances invalid

lhc-risk

It just gets worse for CERN and its attempts to reassure us that the Large Hadron Collider won’t make mincemeat of the planet.

It’s beginning to look as if a massive miscalculation in the safety reckonings means that CERN scientists cannot offer any assurances about the work they’re doing.

In a truly frightening study, Toby Ord and pals at the University of Oxford say that “while the arguments for the safety of the LHC are commendable for their thoroughness, they are not infallible.”

When physicists give a risk assessment, their figure is only correct if their argument is valid. So an important questions is then: what are the chances that the reasoning is flawed?

Ord and co say that roughly one in a 1000 scientific papers have to be withdrawn because of errors. And errors are by no means unknown among particle physicists, even those doing safety calculations

The Oxford team points to a 1999 study of the risk of a “dangerous event” at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York state. This study calculated that the chance of such an event was tiny: 2 x 10^-9.

On the strength of this study, the Collider was deemed safe and operated for five years before a serious error was found in the calculations. (It turned out that the actual risk was closer to 10^-12 but the important point is that there was an error).

The problem is compounded when the chances of a planet-destroying event are deemed to be tiny. In that case, these chances are dwarfed by the chances of an error in the argument. “If the probability estimate given by an argument is dwarfed by the chance that the argument itself is flawed, then the estimate is suspect,” say Ord and co.

Nobody at CERN has put a figure on the chances of the LHC destroying the planet. One study simply said: “there is no risk of any significance whatsoever from such black holes”.

Which means we are left with the possibility that their argument is wrong which Ord reckons conservatively to be about 10^-4, meaning that out of a sample of 10,000 independent arguments of similar apparent merit, one would have a serious error.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that the LHC is dangerous, only that there is no reasonable assurance of safety which, as Mark Buchanan writing in New Scientist this week says, is not the same thing at all.

Even still, when it comes to the lives of 6.5 billion people, we need to have better assurances than this.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0810.5515: Probing the Improbable: Methodological Challenges Risks with Low Probabilities and High Stakes

[Via New Scientist]

Update: as an aid to the discussion here is a link to CERN’s analysis of the safety of LHC collisions, which was published last year.

113 Responses to “Massive miscalculation makes LHC safety assurances invalid”

  1. Wonderful article on the many questions you answered me really great! Share this article the rest of my friends! Yours!

  2. asd says:

    Hey there, You have done an excellent job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I’m confident they will be benefited from this site.

  3. Me gusta este blog Sitio mucho, Es una muy traqueteo terreno a y localización Info.

  4. Thank you for that smart critique. Me & my neighbour were preparing to do some research about that. We received a excellent book on that matter from our local library and most books where not as influensive as your information and facts. I am pretty glad to see these information which I was searching for a lengthy time.

  5. Beneficial post. I do think that do natural food eating plan will help us to get rid of our excess fat naturally. I own a wonderful knowledge about this diet around my review. You need to a look intended for moment during my own site.

  6. imiffisdicugh says:

    http://hqfind.org.ua/in.cgi?4&parameter=tramadol&num=3

    purchase cheap TRAMADOL in gainesville
    cheapest online TRAMADOL
    buying cheap TRAMADOL in midland
    purchase cheap TRAMADOL in lagos
    purchase cheapest TRAMADOL in nc
    buy cheapest TRAMADOL in alexandria
    buy cheapest TRAMADOL in hi
    purchase TRAMADOL in chennai
    TRAMADOL shipped by ups
    purchase TRAMADOL in el paso
    purchase cheap TRAMADOL online
    order TRAMADOL in louisville
    TRAMADOL in state of iowa
    buy cheapest TRAMADOL in wuhan
    TRAMADOL with next day delivery without prescription with free
    TRAMADOL order overnight saturday delivery 77
    purchase cheapest TRAMADOL in state of north carolina
    buy cheap TRAMADOL in warren
    cheap TRAMADOL in houston
    how to order TRAMADOL online without a rx
    buy cheapest TRAMADOL in saint petersburg
    TRAMADOL in cleveland
    order TRAMADOL online c o d
    order cheapest TRAMADOL in lewisville
    order TRAMADOL in mesquite
    buy cheapest TRAMADOL in norman
    TRAMADOL in riyadh
    buy TRAMADOL in sunnyvale
    purchase cheapest TRAMADOL in pittsburgh
    buying cheapest TRAMADOL in state of connecticut
    buy TRAMADOL fda dea approved
    TRAMADOL cod $10.00 coupon
    buy TRAMADOL in bellevue
    purchase cheap TRAMADOL in pueblo
    cheapest TRAMADOL in canada
    get TRAMADOL in waco
    buying TRAMADOL in the santo domingo
    order TRAMADOL in san antonio
    TRAMADOL in oceanside
    buying TRAMADOL in billings
    buying cheapest TRAMADOL in chongqing
    buy cheap TRAMADOL with dr prescription
    TRAMADOL meds no prescription needed
    buy cheap TRAMADOL in chicago
    get cheap TRAMADOL in carrollton

  7. Somebody essentially forbear to liberate sincerely posts I would state. This is the extraordinarily first time I frequented your network page and hence far? I surprised with the investigate you made to initiate this noteworthy publish incredible. Outlandish job!

  8. Once I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I get four emails with the identical comment. Is there any approach you can take away me from that service? Thanks Free Submission

  9. Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. Thanks for sharing.

  10. whoah this weblog is great i really like studying your articles. Stay up the good paintings! You recognize, a lot of individuals are hunting round for this information, you can aid them greatly.

  11. This blog won’t show up correctly on my iphone 4 – you might want to try and fix that

  12. TA-65 says:

    Our intention can be to evaluation problems identified according even although in the path of distinctive genres of composing.

  13. ubuntu vps says:

    Hiya very cool website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally…I’m satisfied to seek out numerous helpful information right here in the submit, we’d like develop extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

Leave a Reply