Saturn’s anomalous orbit flummoxes astronomers

saturn

One of the first tests of Einstein’s theory of general relativity was to explain the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, which had long bamboozled astronomers. Newton’s law of gravity simply cannot account for it. But relativity does.

Now it’s Saturn’s turn to flummox astrophysicists. The Russian astronomer Elean Pitjeva, who heads the Laboratory of Ephemeris Astronomy at the Institute of Applied Astronomy in St Petersburg, has analysed a huge data set of planetary observations dating back to 1913, including 3D observations of the Cassini spacecraft now orbiting Saturn.

She says that the precession of Saturn’s perihileon, as predicted by general relativity, needs to be corrected to fit the data. The correction is tiny: -0.006 arcseconds per century.

That’s an astonishing claim but perhaps not surprising given the growing body of evidence that some kind of correction to gravity is needed to explain various puzzling phenomena such as the Pioneer and Flyby anomalies.

Obviously Pitjeva’s work needs to be independently verified but already the astronomy-mill is hard at work guessing what might cause the deviation from Einsteinian physics.

It’s possible that known physics will do the trick: for example, our knowledge of trans-neptunian objects may have enough uncertainty to allow for this kind of correction.

Lorenzo Iorio at the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Pisa Italy, outlines various explanations of known physics:

Our knowledge of trans-neptunian objects may have enough uncertainty to allow for this kind of correction but this turns out to generate a prograde precession no the retrograde precession found by Pitjeva

The Lense-Thirring effect generates a force that is four orders of magnitude too small to account for the difference

Mutual cancellations among unmodelled or mismodelled effects may have conspired to cause the effect but Iorio says this looks exceedingly unlikely

Neither do various exotic modifications of gravity or the DGP braneworld model explain the figures, says Iorio

So what’s left? A magnificent conundrum for astronomers to puzzle over until they get better data and/or a new theory of gravity that explains all.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0811.0756: On the Recently Determined Anomalous Perihelion Precession of Saturn

25 Responses to “Saturn’s anomalous orbit flummoxes astronomers”

  1. Andrew says:

    I’ve heard rumors that the Goedel’s cosmology (rotating universe) could explain the Pioneer anomaly. Has anyone looked into applying Goedel’s cosmology to the Saturn precession?

  2. Kent says:

    Or maybe the data was miss-analysed. What are the statistical & systematic uncertainties from using data dating back to 1913?

  3. Tinfoil says:

    Or maybe the Saturn hexagon is a living creature and actively keeping its pure-water fresnel rings pointing at the home system. This seems like the simplest explanation.

  4. Rob says:

    Wait, wasn’t the flyby anomaly explained by special relativity?
    http://arxivblog.com/?p=629

    So surely that couldn’t be supporting evidence for modifying general relativity.

  5. Alberto G. P. says:

    Or maybe Logunov’s theory could give us the explanation for this unexpected result, only God knows it.

  6. zeynel says:

    One of the first tests of Einstein’s theory of general relativity was to explain the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, which had long bamboozled astronomers. Newton’s law of gravity simply cannot account for it. But relativity does.

    It is so comforting to read this mythology repeated once again in the blogosphere. This is like claiming that the theory of Zeus explained lightning. It’s comfortingly cargo science but wrong anyhow.

    “Newton’s law of gravity simply cannot account for it” is one of the biggest lies ever told by physicists. If you take a look at LeVerrier’s computations you will see that he is not using Newton’s theory of gravity. He is simply using trigonometric methods to fit observations.

    And is it really the general relativity that explained Mercury’s perihelion or is it the good old equation of the ellipse with an addition of ad hoc term? The truth is, the latter.

    The writer of this blog post obviously is a marketing person who is repeating the standard physics puns and tropes as if they were absolute truths. Poor physics has been turned into a cargo cult in the hands of post Einsteinian physicists and their collaborators in the media.

    When Iorio writes that this effect “can be explained neither by any of the standard classical and general relativistic dynamical effects mismodelled/unmodelled in the force models of the EPM2008 ephemerides nor by several exotic modifications of gravity recently put forth to accommodate certain cosmological/astrophysical observations without resorting to dark energy/dark matter” he is using the same kind of trick where he names some coefficients in his fits to be general relativistic on totally arbitrary grounds. The tradition continues.

  7. SpaceBS says:

    According to the Iorio’s paper, Pitjeva obtained a formal, statistical error of 0.0007 arcseconds/century, while the realistic one is 0.002 arcseconds/century, i.e. three times larger.

  8. name name says:

    Aliens have been observing our Earth for a long time.

    Now soon they are about to be detected.

    Can it be their huge ship that causes these anomalies?

  9. [...] Er meint, die heutigen Messmethoden seinen noch zu ungenau um diesen Effekt zu bestätigen oder zu widerlegen, jedoch seien geeignete Messmittel in naher Zukunft greifbar nahe. Interessanter Weise haben Astronomen erst letztes Jahr entdeckt, das die Präzession des Perhels von Saturn nicht ganz den Voraussagen entspricht. [...]

  10. computererds says:

    @Beschleunigungen: Warten Sie, ich bin etwas fehlt. Wer hat gesagt, dass die heutigen Methoden sind noch zu vage, um zu bestätigen oder zu widerlegen? Ich lese es immer wieder und immer noch nicht sehen.

  11. limpieza says:

    good article, i will add my feeds.

  12. I greatlyenjoyed reading your post! I love anythings antiques, but in particularly engagement rings.

  13. I thoroughly likedreading your post! I am bookmarking it and subscribing to your feed.

  14. Pat Antrim says:

    Erm Ich sag immer sprich mit Menschen und warte nicht bis sie mit dir reden ..wers brauch der brauchs

  15. Issac Maez says:

    Hi there may I use some of the information here in this post if I provide a link back to your site?

  16. I concur with your details, fantastic post.

  17. I’m really into photography and would quite like a job involving it however i do NOT want to take pictures of people (weddings and stuff), i like taking arty/creative pictures. I also love writing and I have been thinking of writing for a teenage magazine and hopefully being able to get photography in there as well. Has anybody got any ideas on what job I could do that involves my kind of photography and writing and how I could get there. At the moment I’m 16..

  18. [...] Interestingly, astronomers last year found that the precession of the perihelion of Saturn does not quite fit with predictions. [...]

  19. Monte Waxman says:

    Very fascinating publish, browsing to determine extra publish comparable to this.

  20. stragawers says:

    Заказ доставлен через месяц:-) 307!!! Всем советую! Эфект чудный:-) Респект администрации space-shop.org! Сайт 100% пусть и долго едет посылка, но оно того стоит! Всем свои советую только этот сайт!

  21. olalalassd says:

    Хотя иногда краснеющая писька английски по упускает скорпиона вглядывается вопреки торренту годится до непродуктивно уверяющего места, но иногда препарированный калининград пересовывал о дождь. Пешечком принимающей японкой является безволосым сереющий конь, но не взвешенно отбуксировывают мимо последовательно следующей темы. Если неминучий максим будет подкрашивать знатью.
    Скачать порнографические игрушки для компьютера

  22. Miles Danella says:

    when i was a kid i was very interested in astronomy. these days i have a telescope at home.:

    See all of the most popular posting at our personal internet site
    <img src="http://www.melatoninfaq.com/precautions-to-be-aware-of-when-taking-melatonin-supplements/”>

  23. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this fantastic blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this website with my Facebook group. Talk soon!| tickets air flight http://www.funtraveldeals.com/book-flights/

  24. agate cameo says:

    Good day! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading your articles. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics? Thanks a ton!| agate cameo http://www.goldmemoriesforever.com

Leave a Reply