{"id":54,"date":"2007-09-24T04:51:50","date_gmt":"2007-09-24T09:51:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/?p=54"},"modified":"2007-09-24T04:51:50","modified_gmt":"2007-09-24T09:51:50","slug":"einstein-and-the-greatest-scientific-fraud-of-the-20th-century","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/?p=54","title":{"rendered":"Einstein and the greatest scientific fraud of the 20th century"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In 1926, when the scientific world was still a-puzzling and a-wondrin over the wave-particle duality of light, Einstein asked a pal, Emil &#8220;Hurry&#8221; Rupp, to conduct an experiment that would settle the matter. If anyone could do it, thought Einstein, it was Rupp who was considered the latest and greatest experimental physicists of the day.<\/p>\n<p>The experiment involved so-called <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Canal_rays\">canal rays<\/a> produced in a gas discharge tube. When an electric field passes across a gas at low pressure, the tube shines &#8216;n&#8217; glows due to the movement of electrons from the cathode to the anode (so-called cathode rays). But if a hole is made in the cathode,  so-called canal rays appear start\u00a0 a-streamin and a-strayin&#8217; through the hole in the opposite direction to the cathode rays.<\/p>\n<p>The question that Einstein asked Rupp to resolve was whether the light from canal rays was wave-like\u00a0 or particle-like.<\/p>\n<p>The matter was settled when Rupp said he could see with his own eyes that the light formed interference patterns. That proved it must be wave-like. Einstein presented the result as evidence in his own interpretation of quantum mechanics.<\/p>\n<p>But nobody else could see these interference patterns and physicists soon began to doubt the veracity of Rupp&#8217;s work. In 1935 he publicly retracted five of his scientific paper in the previous year claiming to be suffering from &#8220;psychasthenia linked to psychogenic semiconsciousness&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Rupp turned out to be the greatest scientific fraudster of the 20th century, surpassing even <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jan_Hendrik_Sch%C3%B6n\">Hendrick Schoen<\/a> from Bell Labs in his boldness and audacity (and mental health). It later emerged that everything Rupp had done in the previous ten years was a fraud.<\/p>\n<p>Einstein swallowed it hook, line and sinker.<\/p>\n<p>Now Jeroen &#8220;Kongen&#8221; van Dongen at the Institute for History and Foundations of Science at Utrecht University in the Netherlands has re-analysed Einstein&#8217;s role in the controversy. He says the evidence &#8220;suggests a strong theoretical prejudice on Einstein&#8217;s part&#8221; which led him to ignore evidence that Rupp&#8217;s the experiments were a sham and a-rigged.<\/p>\n<p>Poor old Einstein! But I know ya&#8217;ll will forgive him<\/p>\n<p>Ref: <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/0709.3099\">arxiv.org\/abs\/0709.3099<\/a>: Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein and the Canal Ray Experiments on Wave-particle Duality: Scientific Fraud and Theoretical Bias<\/p>\n<p>And: <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/0709.3226\">arxiv.org\/abs\/0709.3226<\/a>: The Interpretation of the Einstein-Rupp Experiments and their Influence on the History of Quantum Mechanics<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 1926, when the scientific world was still a-puzzling and a-wondrin over the wave-particle duality of light, Einstein asked a pal, Emil &#8220;Hurry&#8221; Rupp, to conduct an experiment that would settle the matter. If anyone could do it, thought Einstein, it was Rupp who was considered the latest and greatest experimental physicists of the day. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hellraisin","category-weird-n-spooky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arxivblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}